News:

Skill.jobs Forum is an open platform (a board of discussions) where all sorts of knowledge-based news, topics, articles on Career, Job Industry, employment and Entrepreneurship skills enhancement related issues for all groups of individual/people such as learners, students, jobseekers, employers, recruiters, self-employed professionals and for business-forum/professional-associations.  It intents of empowering people with SKILLS for creating opportunities, which ultimately pursue the motto of Skill.jobs 'Be Skilled, Get Hired'

Acceptable and Appropriate topics would be posted by the Moderator of Skill.jobs Forum.

Main Menu

Strategic compensation

Started by arif, April 19, 2017, 09:07:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

arif

Strategic compensation

There are many research studies on what drives employee engagement. Interestingly enough, compensation is not usually at the top of the list, but, as an employee yourself, you know that people do care about how much they are paid. You could go online and see what the average American worker in your industry is paid, but that won't drive performance and it's not strategic. So let's look at some other options for setting up employee compensation. One option is called pay for performance. This means that employees and managers are paid for accomplishing a goal. Some examples are, maintaining a quality score of 95% on customer service calls, or completing some big project.

Another example might be offering raises in conjunction with your annual performance evaluations, where people who receive all fives on their rating scale receive a 3% raise, and anyone who doesn't gets a standard 2% raise. The idea is that employees are promised more pay for better performance. This option only works if the processes and environment make achieving the goals feasible.



Source: https://www.linkedin.com/learning/strategic-human-resources/strategic-compensation