News:

Skill.jobs Forum is an open platform (a board of discussions) where all sorts of knowledge-based news, topics, articles on Career, Job Industry, employment and Entrepreneurship skills enhancement related issues for all groups of individual/people such as learners, students, jobseekers, employers, recruiters, self-employed professionals and for business-forum/professional-associations.  It intents of empowering people with SKILLS for creating opportunities, which ultimately pursue the motto of Skill.jobs 'Be Skilled, Get Hired'

Acceptable and Appropriate topics would be posted by the Moderator of Skill.jobs Forum.

Main Menu

Trademark law and ROP

Started by arif, April 19, 2017, 12:37:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

arif

Trademark law and ROP

Trademarks are things that we use as brands. They're words or designs that help consumers know who the source of a product is. While a person can use a name as a trademark, the rights one gets from Right of Publicity Law differ from trademark protection. Imagine a celebrity who is asked to endorse a product. The use of their face or their name to endorse the product is a right of publicity. Their name and their image are not trademarks of the company, they're simply using their name to tell consumers that this is a good product and that they believe in it.

However, when a celebrity uses their actual name on a product, then they're not exploiting their right of publicity, but creating trademark rights that tie their name to a product as a brand. Jessica Simpson is famous and has probably been paid to endorse a variety of products, but she also owns a shoe brand that literally has her name on shoes as the brand for the shoes. Trademark rights are tied to the use of a brand on a good or service. Right of publicity does not need.

Source: https://www.linkedin.com/learning/understanding-rights-of-publicity-a-deeper-dive/trademark-law-and-rop